Lean Accounting with Event Types

In a period of economic downturn, competitive advantage goes to those companies that can reduce their expenses and operate more efficiently than their competitors. The purpose of this post is to investigate how companies can reduce their bookkeeping expenses, a burden that is common to every business in existence. Can most financial recording be made simple enough that it does not require a skilled financial worker to perform the chore and can it be done with a minimal amount of data-entry labor?

For most transactions within a typical company, the answer is an obvious “yes.” This is evidenced by the use of modern Point-of-Service (POS, i.e. cash registers) that are implemented with software that automatically records the critical accounting data of each revenue transaction as it occurs. Thousands of transactions are fully recorded for the company’s accounting system with the mere push of a button by a relatively untrained clerk at a check-out counter. Many business transactions are already fully automated and are nearly costless to the business.

But, there are many other forms of business transactions than the revenue-generating operations that occur essentially within a cash register. Expenses, capital investments, depreciation, and payment of credit are just some of the transactions that cannot be handled by the modern cash register. However, as we will see, these less automated transactions can also be reduced to a minimum effort by people who have no bookkeeping skills.

How can advanced bookkeeping be accomplished by people who do not understand debits and credits? To fully satisfy all of the requirements of the Generally Accepted Accounting Practices, the only thing that a worker would have to do is enter the amount of a transaction and select the type of event that the transaction represents. The selection process would be made easy with a user interface that presents the various “Event Types” in an intuitive and foolproof manner.

Hidden within each “Event Type” would be the identity of the accounts that are credited and debited. The person doing the bookkeeping could be an untrained clerk who has been given a simple introduction to the few Event Types that are affected by his role in the company. The selection of debit and credit is transparent to him, making the bookkeeping process simple.

The person entering data would also have control to set the date, but the default of the current date would suffice in the vast majority of cases. The Event Type would supply a default note about the transaction, which the user could also edit at his own will.

In summary, very advanced bookkeeping could be performed by the unskilled by simply selecting the type of the event and entering the amount. The particular Event Types and the accounts that they affect could be tailored to fit any business model in any industry. The resulting effect of the use of Event Types would be to reduce the most challenging bookkeeping operations to an operation requiring less skill than the operation of a cash register.

21. Finance is all about Flow

Essentially, double-entry bookkeeping is a process by which business entities track the flow of resources from one place to another. However, because accounting reports were developed when computational tools were limited or nonexistent, they do not report a measurement of this all important flow.

Contrary to myth, the recording of each transaction in two places is not a method of error checking; each of the two data entries of an accounting transaction has a specific meaning that allows businesses to maintain a record of their dynamic activity, rather than mere static positions. The two entries of double-entry bookkeeping, of course, are called “credit” and “debit.” The credit entry represents a withdrawal from the source of the transfer and the debit entry represents a deposit in the transaction’s ultimate destination. By entering both the credit and debit ends of resource transfer, the bookkeeper is actually producing a complete record of a movement of financial resources, a “flow” of resources from one place to another.

The standard GAAP reports are all produced from the balances that remain at the various source and destination accounts. With the exception of the Cash Flow Statement, they do not report the important record of what is originally recorded by the bookkeeper – the actual flow of resources that occurs between various accounts. This is surely a product of the crude and limited computational tools that were available to the originators of the reports. Perhaps with the recent invention of the Cash Flow Statement, however, this limitation is beginning to change.

The Cash Flow Statement represents a leap forward in accounting practices. It reports more than the existing balances within various accounts; it actually attempts to track the flow that changed those balances during a period. The Cash Flow Statement, however, is limited to only those flows that affect the Cash account, but it perhaps points to the potentially much greater amount of information that can be produced with modern automation.

With modern automation and data structures, the Cash Flow Statement, or even a more general flow report, should be the easiest to produce. That fact that it is problematic for most accounting departments is a result of the fact that financial reports are produced from the resulting balances in accounts rather than the potentially trivial process of measuring flow by simply totaling all transactions by the combination of the account that they credit and the account that they debit.

A complete report of the total amount of flow between all of the accounts can be done easily with modern data warehouse architecture and, from these total flows, we can measure the changes of balances that they cause and thereby produce all of the other GAAP reports. Furthermore, we can keep a database of daily flows that would allow us to produce dynamic reports for arbitrary windows of time, rather than the current practice of generating reports for specific periods only.